All three machines are distinctive in their overall appeal. The Corolla looks subtle, although possibly even boring from some angles. Of course, it’s a familiar shape – with the only change between the petrol and newly introduced diesel being the front grille. The diesel gets a black honeycomb grille, versus the chrome slats on the petrol. The Cruze, on the other hand, is at the opposite end of the style spectrum. GM’s design department has been churning out some attractive looking products internationally, and the Cruze stands as a perfect case in point. It looks aggressive and intimidating from the front – the sharp lines of this machine will surely tickle your senses. In fact, the sloping roofline makes the Cruze look like an oversized coupe! The Laura, on the other hand, is a middle-of-the-road sort of design. The front end evokes masculinity, but the rear is staid and somewhat featureless. But, call it sophisticated or up-market, the Laura definitely sets the tone for the suit and tie wearing business executive.

When it was confirmed that Toyota would be launching a diesel version of the Corolla, everyone was hoping to see a 1.8 or a 2.0 litre unit under the hood. Instead, what we got was a 1.4 litre engine that’s good for (just) 88 horses.

Well, the simple reason for this is efficiency. After all, Toyota claim a fuel efficiency figure of 18km/l. What we saw on the on-board computer was actually 14km/l – but bear in mind that the accelerator pedal is liberally used during vehicle testing. The display on the other two cars, on the other hand, suggested closer to 12.5km/l. So, you will get additional efficiency from the Corolla. But you’ll also get an engine that sounds coarse in comparison. With the radio or CD playing, it’s bearable, but turn it off and the diesel clatter gets
quite intrusive.

Nevertheless, the 1,364cc common-rail unit offers a reasonable 205Nm of torque that’s more than sufficient in city driving. Even on the highway, if you keep the engine spinning above 2000rpm, and therefore the turbo on boil, the Corolla has the legs to keep up with the Laura all the way to the stratospheric end of the speedometer – although at those speeds you do wish the steering had more feel. However, the ride quality of the Corolla is the best of the lot courtesy of its compliant set-up using McPherson struts in front and a torsion beam axle at the rear, which helps to prevent even the biggest potholes from entering the cabin. Meanwhile, the 6-speed manual gearbox is a joy to operate and offers slick and precise throws.

However, more exciting from behind the wheel, and bigger in engine size, is the Cruze, which features a 1,991cc common-rail engine delivering 148bhp and a massive 323Nm of turning force. In fact, once you’ve settled down after having a go at all the gadgetry inside, you quickly realize that this diesel unit is one to lookout for. Here again, there’s a little turbo lag under 1800rpm, but beyond that the 148 horses unleash their fury on the road below. The Cruze can easily touch speeds in excess of 180km/h, and even at those speeds it feels quite sturdy. Moreover, the steering is sharp and the chassis very direct, which makes for a very inviting drivers’ car. It’s let down, however, by a gearshift linkage that’s imprecise, and an engine that’s not quite as refined as the one in the Skoda.

It isn’t just the quality of the interior on our Laura test car, in Elegance trim, that sets it apart from the rest – it also has the most civilized unit under the bonnet. At 110bhp, it’s giving away almost 40 horses to the Cruze, but you’d be hard pressed to tell that by the immediate response of the engine. There isn’t even a hint of turbo lag or diesel clatter as the revs rise with consummate ease in this new 2.0 litre TDi common-rail motor. Add to that the refinement of the chassis, as well as all the controls, and the Laura is clearly the most complete automobile here.

So, at the end of the day, who is the actual Road Runner?

Well, in terms of economy, the Corolla comes out on top. Not only does it offer the best mileage, but, in all likelihood, will also come with the most economical service costs. Moreover, it should hold its value better than the other two thanks to Toyota’s reputation in the Indian market, which hasn’t been affected in any way by the recent global recalls.

The Cruze should clearly be the choice for those who want a little extra from behind the wheel – not only does the cockpit entice the driver, but so does the 148bhp on tap. It also makes a very compelling case for itself in the value-for-money stakes courtesy of all the niceties on offer, such as keyless-entry-and-drive, on-board infotainment, and a sunroof. But, you’re not quite as comfortable in the rear seat, and you aren’t assured of solid resale the way you are with the Toyota.

The most complete package, however, belongs to the Skoda. It may be the most pricey – and especially in Elegance trim, it’s up to a lakh-and-a-half more than the Corolla – but it has the best build quality and materials, and is also the most refined of the lot. However, Skoda’s are notorious for high maintenance costs, so it will run you that much more in the long run.

If its economy and rear seat comfort you’re after, the Corolla is the clear winner. If the drivers’ chair beckons you more, the Cruze will put a smile on your face. And, if your budget allows, the Skoda will provide the highest levels of refinement – which one you choose will depend on whether you value the Road Runner for being efficient, fast, or a bit of both.